CITY
COUNCIL
REGULAR ADJOURNED
MEETING MINUTES
DATE OF
MEETING:
May 20, 2003
TIME OF
MEETING:
7:00 P.M.
PLACE OF
MEETING:
RED BLUFF COMMUNITY CENTER
The agenda for this meeting
was posted pursuant to Resolution No. 28-1995
Councilmembers
Present: Tere Cherveny,
Mayor
Forrest Flynn, Mayor Pro
Tem
Andy Houghton
Larry Stevens
Gregg Avilla
Councilmembers
Absent: None
Staff
Present:
Susan Price, City Manager
Richard Crabtree, City
Attorney
Gary Antone, Director of Public Works
Rob Gibbs, Director of Parks and Recreation
Charles Hayden, Planning Director
Gloria Shepherd, City
Clerk
Michael Damon, Fire Chief
Al Shamblin, Police Chief
Roberta Moore, City Treasurer
Tina Lee, Fire Marshall
J.D. Ellison, Building Director/Official
Mace McIntosh, Police Captain
Margaret Van Warmerdam, Director of Finance
The Executive Session started at 5:30 P.M., and was regarding negotiations with the Miscellaneous Unit and no action was taken.
Mayor Cherveny called the
Regular Adjourned Meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
Mayor Cherveny began the meeting in wishing Susan Price, City Manager, a Happy Birthday and invited everyone present to sing Happy Birthday to her.
Susan Price, City Manager
led the Pledge of Allegiance at the request of Mayor Cherveny and the assemblage
joined in.
CITIZENS COMMENTS
None
INTRODUCTION
Mayor Cherveny introduced the new Building Director/Official, J.D. Ellison and welcomed him to the City Staff. Mr. Ellison has extensive training and education relating to standards of enforcement by the Building Department and 16 years experience as a Contractor.
PROCLAMATION
FRIDAY NIGHT LIVE, CLUB LIVE, FNL KIDS AND FNL MENTORING MONTH
CONSENT CALENDAR
M/S/C Avilla, Flynn to approve the
Consent Calendar
AYES: Councilmembers: Avilla, Cherveny, Flynn, Houghton, Stevens
NOES:
None
ABSENT OR NOT
VOTING:
None
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Approved 5-0
RESOLUTION NO. 26-2003 AMENDMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH CITY MANAGER
Approved
5-0
REPORT REGARDING CONTRACT AWARDS AND DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS EQUIPMENT – APRIL 2003
Approved 5-0
RATIFY/APPROVE APRIL 2003 PAYROLL CHECKS NUMBERS 13522-13693; PAYROLL DIRECT DEPOSIT NUMBERS 1430-1566 /APRIL PAYABLES CHECK NUMBERS 40966-41320
RESOLUTION NO. 22-2003; A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING WEEKLY STREET CLOSURE FOR THE “WEDNESDAY EVENING RED BLUFF FARMERS MARKET”
Approved 5-0
ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 940; REVISE CITY CODE SECTIONS 26.4-1, ESTABLISHMENT OF FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND 26.5-7, SUPPLEMENTAL, PROVISIONS OF THE FLOOD DAMAGE PREVENTION REGULATIONS
Approved 5-0
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RED BLUFF AND RED BLUFF JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR THE OPERATION OF RED BLUFF UNION HIGH SCHOOL SWIMMING POOL
Approved 5-0
ORDINANCE NO. 939; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RED BLUFF AMENDING CHAPTERS 2, 5, 25 AND 26, VARIOUS ARTICLES RELATING TO THE DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT INTO TWO SEPARATE DEPARTMENTS CONSISTING OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AND THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Approved 5-0
RESOLUTION NO. 24-2003 – A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY TO SUBMIT A REGIONAL APPLICATION TO THE CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR THE HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE BLOCK GRANT, HD 12, FISCAL YEAR 2003/2004 ON BEHALF OF THE TEHAMA COUNTY SANITARY LANDFILL AGENCY
Approved 5-0
REQUEST TO REFUND APPLICATION FEES RELATING TO USE PERMIT NO. 334 AND ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION, CHILD CARE CENTER IN P-1 ZONING DISTRICT, 1005 VISTA WAY, NORTH VALLEY SERVICES
Approved 5-0
RESOLUTION NO. 23-2003, VISTA WAY (MEADOW VISTA APTS) NO PARKING ZONE
Approved 5-0
ADOBE ROAD RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION
Approved 5-0
CURRENT BUSINESS
Susan Price, City Manager, reviewed the staff report and gave staff’s recommendation to read the letter into the record and refer the matter back to City Staff with the requirement that a follow-up report be brought back to the City Council.
Mayor Cherveny read the following letter received from Vesper Lodge #84 Temple Association dated May 8, 2003 and addressed to Susan Price, City Manager into the minutes:
“Dear Ms. Price;
The Temple Association for Vesper Masonic Lodge #84 at 822 Main St. are writing you with our concerns regarding the resurfacing of the alley behind our building. This project took place in correlation with the restructuring of the parking facility. The contractor over laid the pavement raising the street level which has resulted in several problems for our lodge.
The first problem was the rear doors to our building would not open, and are now currently below street level. The down spout from the roof on the north end of the building was blocked off by pavement, the down spout on the south side of the building could not drain because it was below the road surface, one basement window is now below street level and the electrical power junction box in the alley is now below street level as well.
This list of problems has resulted in flooding in our building at which time Gary Antone was contacted and he assured us he would make temporary repairs. A ditch has been dug for the back door to allow drainage which does not work, a drainage pipe was added to one down spout which did not work and a barrier put around the rear window which does not work.
With the extraordinary rainy season we have encountered we are experiencing continued water damage to our building.
A claim to our insurance company for the first rain damage has been registered along with an explanation as to why it has occurred. We are continuing to experience water problems with every rain. Our insurance carrier assures us that with future claims they will seek reimbursement from the city.
We at Vesper Masonic Lodge #84 do not wish to cause you any undo distress, however we are unable to except the lack of foresight demonstrated by this recent repair and the attempts to correct the same.
This letter should be read at your next regular meeting and placed in the minutes of that meeting as a matter of record.
Please give this problem your immediate attention whereas our problems continue with every rain.
Sincerely,
Bill Hedge
President”
End of
Letter
M/S/C
Stevens, Avilla to refer the matter back to City Staff with the
requirement that a follow-up report be brought back to the City Council.
AYES:
Councilmembers:
Avilla, Cherveny, Flynn, Houghton, Stevens
NOES:
None
ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: None
PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY OF RED BLUFF AND GREENWASTE OF TEHAMA (GREENWASTE) TO WASTE CONNECTIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. (WASTE CONNECTIONS)
Susan Price, City Manager,
reviewed the staff report and gave staff’s recommendation to discuss the
proposed transfer of Residential and Commercial Franchise Agreements with
GreenWaste of Tehama to Waste Connections of California, Inc. and provide
direction to staff.
Susan Price, City Manager,
indicated that the Tehama County Board of Supervisors did take action on this
issue and then introduced Alan Abbs, Landfill Director, who was available to
give additional information and to answer questions about the process.
Councilmember Flynn asked if
there were any current concerns regarding the Landfill Management and Alan Abbs
explained that the County and the City are working together to make progress
regarding issues for the Management Agency Contract proposals within the next
few months.
Susan Price, City Manager,
explained that one of the documents that will be brought back to the City
Council on June 3, 2003, would be a Resolution that will contain information on
a Franchise Fee. With respect to the current Waste Agreements there are about 4
years left and if the City Council had any specific item to address as a part of
that Franchise Transfer it could be considered in
discussions.
Alan Abbs explained
management agency roles and it was discussed that the best landfill operation
process would be to look at terminating the existing contract with GreenWaste of
Tehama and reissuing a new contract with Waste Connections with modifications to
service out at the Landfill. The
City and the County are proposing to not use that process and look at
transferring the existing franchise.
When the Landfill Management Agency has worked out equitable arrangements
with Waste Connections, then the City and County could use that as a template to
increase service for the City and the County.
Mayor Cherveny discussed the
Clean up Days and her concerns of incorporating this into offering a better
utilization of this program by the public.
Councilmember Avilla asked
if all of the issues had been resolved with Greenwaste and Alan Abbs explained
that the Landfill Management Agencies Contract will have resolution on all of
the issues within the next couple of months and wouldn’t affect the City and
County Contracts.
M/S/C Avilla, Houghton to propose
transfer of Residential and Commercial Franchise Agreements with GreenWaste of
Tehama to Waste Connections of California, Inc. and provide direction to
staff.
AYES:
Councilmembers:
Avilla ,Cherveny, Flynn, Houghton, Stevens
NOES:
None
ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: None
LANDFILL LEACHATE, CITY
SLUDGE ISSUE
Gary Antone, Director of
Public Works, reviewed the staff report and gave staff’s recommendation to
accept the GreenWaste proposal and authorize payment of the landfill fee from
Fund 45-43-330-100 in the amount of $16,560.81.
Councilmember Avilla
mentioned the difference in the original bill of $40,000 and now the City is
settling for $16,500.
Alan Abbs, Landfill
Director, explained the process and how the Landfill Agency collects the tipping
fee for waste deposited at the Landfill and how by contract Greenwaste of Tehama
receives a certain percentage of that money to compensate them for machinery and
employees. When the City brought
out $40,000 of the City Waste Water Sludge and a month after receiving the
sludge the management agency by contract was required to pay Greenwaste of
Tehama the proper percentage it owed.
The Management Agency without receiving payment from the City for the 40
tons of sludge paid Greenwaste of Tehama $33,000 for the sludge that was
disposed at the landfill. The
Landfill Agency essentially paid the City’s bill without receiving payment from
the City yet and this Agenda Item takes care of that. GreenWaste of Tehama
decided that since the sludge was able to be used as alternative daily cover the
Landfill was willing to pick up the tab for 50% of the City’s disposal cost and
make the management agency whole.
Gary Antone, Director of
Public Works, pointed out that due to unclear guidelines the City didn’t know
this had taken place until Alan Abbs had brought it to their attention and in
the future it will be set up with the new waste operator to prevent this from
happening this way again.
M/S/C
Houghton, Avilla to accept
the GreenWaste proposal and authorize payment of the landfill fee from Fund
45-43-330-100 in the amount of $16,560.81.
AYES:
Councilmembers:
Avilla, Cherveny, Flynn, Houghton, Stevens
NOES:
None
ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: None
Gary Antone, Director of Public Works, reviewed the staff report and gave staff’s recommendation to accept the ADA Feasibility Study prepared by Thomson & Hendricks. Gary Antone then introduced Nick Ambrosia, Thomson & Hendricks representative, and he expressed appreciation to the City staff and presented the report and check list for this project broken down into three summaries. Priorities included access to the building and entering the building and having access to all of the programs and to public restrooms and consistent minor items such as access to telephones and drinking fountains. Looking for barriers to the building and space available is a part of the fix up process. The recommendation is to make good space planning and solve all access problems. The study was prepared with funding from the Community Development Block Grant Program.
Susan Price, City Manager, expressed appreciation for a high quality job that was very much needed and it will provide a blueprint for the City to move forward.
Copies of the study are available to the public.
M/S/C Flynn, Stevens to accept the
ADA Feasibility Study prepared by Thomson & Hendricks.
AYES:
Councilmembers:
Avilla, Cherveny, Flynn, Houghton, Stevens
NOES:
None
ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: None
Al Shamblin, Police Chief, reviewed the staff report and gave staff’s recommendation to restructure the two existing positions as submitted, adopt the proposed class specifications and salary range for the Police Captain and Lieutenant positions, and authorize the reclassification of the current Police Commander employee to the classification of Police Captain effective May 21, 2003.
The primary function of the
Police Captain will be the operations division such as the patrol and paying of
the bills and planning of department needs and is a very busy
position.
The Lieutenant position is
in charge of the special services such as the detective division, the Community
Service Officers, Dispatch and Records.
M/S/C Stevens, Houghton to restructure the two existing positions as submitted, adopt the proposed class specifications and salary range for the Police Captain and Lieutenant positions, and authorize the reclassification of the current Police Commander employee to the classification of Police Captain effective May 21, 2003.
AYES:
Councilmembers:
Avilla, Cherveny, Flynn, Houghton, Stevens
NOES:
None
ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: None
Susan Price, City Manager,
reviewed the staff report and gave staff’s recommendation to adopt Resolution
No. 25-2003 that incorporates changes and establishes the salary ranges for
Police Captain and Police Lieutenant effective July 1, 2003.
M/S/C Houghton, Flynn to adopt Resolution No. 25-2003.
AYES:
Councilmembers:
Avilla, Cherveny, Flynn, Houghton, Stevens
NOES:
None
ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: None
Gary Antone, Director of Public Works, reviewed staff report and gave staff’s recommendation to approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 3 MG Reservoir and Pipeline Project with the Findings in the document titled “Conditions and Findings”
Mayor Cherveny opened the
Public Hearing at 7:45 p.m. and hearing no comments closed the Public Hearing at
7:45 p.m.
M/S/C Stevens, Flynn to approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the 3 MG Reservoir and Pipeline Project with the Findings in the document titled “Conditions and Findings”
AYES:
Councilmembers:
Avilla, Cherveny, Flynn, Houghton, Stevens
NOES:
None
ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: None
APPEAL PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO APPROVE USE PERMIT 336 ALLOWING A HOMELESS SHELTER AT 1405 MONTGOMERY ROAD
Charles Hayden, Planning Director, reviewed the
staff report and gave staff’s recommendation regarding the appeal to the
approval of Use Permit No. 336 allowing a Homeless Shelter at 1405 Montgomery to
be operated by PATH to:
A. Conduct the public hearing, and consider all public
testimony and all other information submitted relating to the
appeal.
B. Consider taking one of the three actions noted
below:
1.
Uphold the Planning Commission’s
decisions to approve the Homeless Shelter with the findings and conditions
approved by the Planning Commission, or
2.
Uphold the decisions of the
Planning Commission, but modify the conditions of approval with findings
supporting modifications of conditions, or
3.
Reverse the decisions of the
Planning Commission. Deny Use
Permit No. 336 with findings supporting the denial.
Mayor Cherveny stated that the City Council received
a petition presented by the Salvation Army in favor of a permanent Homeless
Shelter and it was passed to the City Clerk to make appropriate copies for each
Council Member. In addition to
information already in the binder there have been letters in support and in
opposition received by the City Council Members and time is being spent looking
at what has been provided.
Councilmember Stevens expressed appreciation for the
letter writing and encouraged people to include their address or phone numbers
in order for the City Council to respond.
Mayor Cherveny opened the Public Hearing at 8:56
p.m. and invited the Public to speak.
Comment #1
Clint Chambers, Manager of the Goldencrest Mobile
Park, took a poll of those present in favor of the Homeless Shelter from
Redding, Anderson, Cottonwood, Corning, Chico, and Los Molinos. He then asked for a showing of hands of
those from the immediate area opposed to the Homeless Shelter as well as those
in the immediate area in favor of it. Mr. Chambers mentioned that no
Environmental Impact Study has been done to this area, and that the building
that is the proposed Homeless Shelter was once a garage that may well have been
contaminated by oils, diesels, gas, transmission fluids, and prestones. Also, that the tents on the property
will be affected by the contaminants.
He also stated that there are two schools close by that will be affected
as well by pilfering. Having traveled the country from here to Detroit and
having been around a lot of homeless places.
Comment #2
Allene Dering, President of PATH, has been
sheltering homeless on an average of 23 per night for the last four years. They
have practiced being good neighbors and corrected situations when complaints
have been made. There are many supporters in the community who support PATH
financially and with volunteers. A packet with more petitions supporting the
Homeless Shelter included 319 more signatures as well as the first 24 signatures
that included people who live in that area. Pictures were also included showing
the sidewalk, an area needing development, a wide area in front of the trailer
park, and PATH plans to raise funds. They are willing to volunteer time in the
clean up of the area and in placement of garbage cans if
needed.
Comment #3
Wesley Crane, Vice President of PATH, and former
co-owner of Crane Mills in Corning and a member of the company Board of
Directors and part of the management team until his retirement. He also served as a Board Member for the
Corning Union High School. He has
accumulated many good friends and the clients who are back on their feet and no
longer homeless can contribute in varying degrees both inside and outside the
shelter. He claimed that Homeless
people are okay and not to be feared when treated with respect. There has not been any damage to any of
the churches to his knowledge that were used since the beginning of the
program. One of the current staff
and a former street person puts in up to six early morning shifts per week and
knows how to get along with clients and gets a lot of help and cooperation from
them. Another former client has
pulled many double shifts during the midnight and early morning shifts and he
considers him a prime candidate for a board member. Another Board Member has been homeless
and used their shelters and since then has been equipment operator and works for
the Mental Health Department. He
explained that it helps their self-esteem and morale and the goal is to get as
many of the clients out of the shelter as self-sufficient citizens as soon as
they are ready to move. PATH also
helps get their needs met for Social Security, Military Retirement, Medical,
Mental, Dental Care, and Help for Addictions, as well as transportation as
needed. The public transportation
to the Greenville Rancheria will be a great help and they will strive to keep
the shelter improving.
Comment #4
Calvin Sisco used the PATH program about a year ago
after a mechanical breakdown. The
church hosting the PATH shelter had some work to do and they have kept him very
busy and it’s about to come to an end.
He suggested that to modify the decision for the Homeless Shelter would
be to provide these and better facilities in the future with training.
Comment #5
Kathleen Hinkle, Stanley Hinkle’s daughter, who
lives in a residence less than 100 yards away from the proposed Homeless Shelter
spoke on behalf of her father, expressing his concerns. She shared how he has owned and lived on
Hinkle Street for 55 years and built Hinkle Street for access to his home and
commercial property at the end of the street. He established his home zoned for
commercial and it is their lively hood and will be threatened by this homeless
shelter. The renters will shy away and the property will lose most of the
value. A four-unit office building
will be hard to rent to a decent business and hoped for a better
solution.
Comment #6
Lorie Uhalde a tenant in the building previously
mentioned, explained that her clients are expressing that they will not continue
being clients if the shelter comes in next door. She is not opposed to the Homeless
Shelter but to the location and the inadequate facility that is trying to be
obtained as well as the traffic issues.
Comment #7
Paul Culp, supporter of homeless shelter, explained
that the property could provide any kind of business that might not be desirable
and that the existing guidelines will all be considered and PATH will be
expected to meet them and perhaps it will increase the value if things are
upgraded.
Comment #8
Jack Hill, supporter and board member of two
shelters in Chico and Redding, chose sites that would not impact people too much
in those areas. Pride and care is
taken in their facility and they police themselves very well. The Red Bluff site is a good location
that will be close to various opportunities.
Comment #9
Jason Rogers, supporter of the shelter, used the
facilities and got his first job in the shelter and was welcomed with care and
honor. If the shelter opens he will
help build on the shelter to help provide a safer place for the
homeless.
Comment #10
Norman Ricketts, supporter of the shelter, was on
the streets with no place to go and made contact and found an apartment and is
self sufficient and if there is anyway to help construction
wise.
Comment #11
Wayne Dykes, in favor of PATH but not on the
property and location due to the liability to the existing tenants there. No one will lease his property out until
this situation is settled and his property has become useless. The property that PATH is locating a
shelter on has contaminated ground and the long time industrial area residents
in this area don’t want to have to move at this time. There have been incidents where homeless
people have been found sleeping on property and equipment has been taken. The building is inadequate and too small
in an industrial area and not a residential area. A better study needs to be made with a
new location and next time not behind the residents back but out in the
open.
Comment #12
Pastor Dave Honey, with Good News Rescue Mission in
Redding, has been in favor of a Rescue Mission in the Area and PATH has taken
over that endeavor. He explained
that they provide shelter as well as many medical and recovery programs that
help the community and that it’s about hurting people not dangerous people and
once these programs are established they will help provide services to help
people. He also explained that
other businesses and agencies work along with the program and they become a
friend to the community. It will
provide a safe centralized unit to manage the homeless problem and continuum of
care and it is important that this Rescue Mission is allowed take place so that
these programs are allowed to develop.
Comment #13
Kim Anderson, supporter of shelter, volunteered
during a power outage every single day for 5 days and had the opportunity to see
that these people are open hearted and that they are just like all of us. She explained that how we take care of
those who cannot take care of themselves reflects on a
community.
Comment #14
Bob Brown, Tehama County Mental Health Homeless
Program Supervisor, addressed the potential for violence by homeless and mental
health clients. Statistics show
that major violence by severely mentally disabled is lower than general public,
but vagrancy and disturbing the peace has some minor escalation. The idea that if a shelter is built it
will draw more homeless in from other areas and it has been shown through the
County program that this has not been the case. He explained that there have been
instances with clients out of the area were able to get back to their hometown
after intervention. The
relationship with Mental Health and PATH has been a good
one.
Comment#15
Mr. Rogers, property owner next to the shelter, with
only 60 feet of fence between them, spoke about the potential campers on the
property and that they will relieve themselves on his fence at night and if he
smells any urine odors he will go down to the Health Department to see what they
can do.
Comment #16
Clarence Hemphill, volunteer at the shelter, has not
seen the kind of actions referred to previously and explained that these people
like anyone. He has been homeless
with a disabled spouse and understands how hard it is to find a place and the
importance of providing a service like this.
Comment #17
Carol Fernandez, PATH Board Member and Shelter
Volunteer, and involved in PATH for three years. With a permanent location they hope to
reach more people and make a difference in peoples lives. They are just regular people and not
derelicts. She explained that when
a person stumbles and falls it’s comforting to know that there is someone there
to help you back on your feet.
Comment #18
Christina Culp, property owner at 1405 Montgomery
Road and supporter of the shelter, previously found herself homeless with 2
children. She applied with the
Social Services Assistance program and there was a week waiting period. She was told that if she was found
living in a car with her children they could be taken away from her. During that waiting period it would have
been nice to have a place available to keep families together until they could
get assistance. PATH doesn’t promote homelessness but rather a hand up not a
hand out. The projected building
renovation should have about 4000 square feet of usable space.
Comment #19
Ken Hunt, client and volunteer at the shelter,
responded to those who want the shelter but don’t want it here by saying that
the shelter wouldn’t be anything but good.
The shelter has rules and the organization has to follow them and if
anything violent happens the shelter communicates with the sheriff’s
department. The people who use the
shelter come there and receive dignity and respect. The PATH people have a network of
volunteers and staff organization and he encouraged the City Council to approve
this.
Comment #20
Kim O’Connell, volunteer at the Rescue Mission in
Redding and a teacher at the House of Hope for rehabilitation, see’s a need for
the homeless people. She lives on
Montgomery Road and travels to Redding for the last 2 years because there wasn’t
a permanent program locally. She is
willing to patronize those businesses near the shelter and supports the local
businesses in that area.
Comment#21
Alberta Antone, concerned citizen, explained that
she is not against the PATH Program but wanted to understand why they only
provide a service to people in the evening and then they are let out on the
street in the morning and can’t come back until the next evening. She had an experience at the McDonald’s
Restaurant in Redding where the restaurant manager had a homeless person leave
the premises on a rainy day. Mrs.
Antone kept her in her car and finally had to go home and had to let her out
onto the streets. She has seen this
happen before and wanted to know if this was really the case and if so why was
it they couldn’t take care of them during the day hours when there is a
need.
Comment # 22
Jan Simmons, supporter of the shelter, explained
that the homeless shelter is something that we have to have and the location
near the schools is a concern but it’s also where the homeless children go to
school. She explained that it’s a
problem that’s here and it’s the right thing to do. A decision needs to be made
today, because the next place they choose to put a homeless shelter they will
not want it there either and for the sake of the children and the people who are
just trying to get up she felt we need to get this done.
Comment #23
David Pot, supporter of shelter, has used the
shelter and he was grateful for the great staff and he hopes it goes
through.
Comment #24
Dave Lamberson, Pastor of a local church and
President of the Red Bluff Ministerial Administration. He explained that the Ministerial
Association voted unanimously for the need for this shelter and that PATH has
passed with tremendous integrity and that there is no ideal location. The churches feel that what they are
providing is inadequate and they support something more permanent like
PATH.
Comment #25
Donald Tacconi, supporter of the shelter, has been
homeless and used the shelter and shown the ropes on how to get what he needed
and the help he desired. He
explained that it would be an error not to give credit to the PATH board members
and volunteers. The PATH shelter is
a seasonal shelter and he requested that this permanent shelter be put
through.
Comment #26
Barbara Dykes, concerned citizen, asked if the City
Council had actually driven by and looked at the site and if they thought it
would be big enough to accommodate 40 people. If there are currently 57 homeless
people locally, what will happen to those 17 people with no place to go. They
may be hanging around her husband’s shop or the neighborhood on Montgomery Rd
and sometimes she has to go to the shop at early hours and she would be afraid
to get out her car. She felt that
there should be a homeless shelter but that this was not a good location for
it.
Comment #27
Betty Marsh, teacher at Metteer School, explained
that she also has to be up at the early hours and expressed her concern for the
children who come from the homeless shelter and who need to attend school. The location would be good for those
children to have the homeless shelter nearby and that it would be good for them
to be close to medical facilities in the area as well.
Comment #28
Barbara McIver, concerned citizen and supporter of
shelter, explained that the problem of homelessness is attributed to the fact
that we have failed to adequately develop affordable housing. This is an opportunity to address
homelessness by making a decision whether we prefer to have people on the street
or in a shelter and in a social connected network. She understands the problems and
concerns expressed by prospective neighbors and proposed that perhaps the
residents have the opportunity to have better neighbors than the random
neighbors that we all get. We don’t
get to choose our neighbors or make decisions about land use or property unless
we are prepared to purchase it and be completely self determining. PATH is shown
that they are concerned about their role and willing to resolve any problems
that may arise as they may arise in any neighborhood situation.
Comment #29
Helen Hoover, Fred’s Auto Clinic Employee, explained
that this piece of property is a very little area and not big enough for tents
and dogs with no place for kids to play.
Some of the people have cars and she wondered where will there be room
for them to park them.
Comment # 30
Dennis Cox, concerned citizens, asked if there had
been anything said about tents on the property and whether anyone had been
homeless. He said that the homeless
are not there because they want to be but because of circumstances and that the
4000 square feet for the shelter would be better than living under a
bridge.
Comment #31
Pastor Gilbert Delao, concerned citizen, explained
that in looking for a facility he looks for a minimum impact and affect on a
community and residential area, how it impacts the retail community, and the
efficiency of the location to help out the people. He feels that PATH has done a good job
at addressing all three of those points and will be good for the
community.
Comment #32
Marty Watson, wife of Fred’s Auto Clinic, also owns
her own business over by the Goodwill Rescue Mission and understands the need
for help for them. She has no
trouble with her salon with anybody that goes by there. But she disagrees with the building that
they have chosen, as it is not insulated, it’s not big, it’s poorly constructed,
there’s just no room for these people who need a home. She is not opposing PATH in any way and
the building is not going to serve anyone.
It is an old garage not meant to house people and those people need more
than that building is going to provide and the City Council needs to take a look
at this building. Montgomery Road is very busy now and there are talks of
putting Shasta College there and what will they do with the impact on traffic
Comment #33
Doug Smith, Retired Methodist Pastor, has worked for
Loaves and Fishes in Sacramento for three years where they raise about 3 million
dollars to take care of the problems in that area. His residence in Red Bluff ended up
having a rehab for addicts move into a house next to his residence recently and
he decided to see how this works first before condemning it. The rehab group fixed up the yard and
the fence and it has turned out to be a successful experience. He talked about how the pledge of
allegiance includes the phrase about liberty and justice for all. He feels that part of the responsibility
belongs to him now and rather than feeling very bad about the worth to his
house, he has seen how much good it has done instead and that he is glad that he
lives where he does.
Comment #34
Phyllis Hemphill, supporter of shelter, has been
homeless and is a volunteer with PATH and she says that they do so much to
rehabilitate people. Although it
seems small they have plans for it and one of the reasons the homeless had to
leave early was because the host churches had events going on and they had to
leave. Referrals and fundraising
are done with PATH and they just received a grant for a permanent full-time
director to improve their networking capabilities. PATH works well as a unit of
all faiths and there are so many wonderful homeless people out there who pick up
the grounds before they leave for the day.
They want to be in the mainstream and not homeless. She asked the City Council to provide
the permit and that they will provide a place for the homeless to
stay.
Comment#35
Judy Crane, volunteer for PATH, guaranteed that
these people want to be the best citizen they can be and they need to be given a
chance. They can’t put people into
the building until it meets the City requirements and the community will be
better by the building when it is finished.
Comment #36
Fred Watson, owner of Fred’s Auto Clinic, discussed
the sidewalk in the pictures presented earlier and how the sidewalk ends at the
Triangle Motel. He commented on the
snickers and laughter by the supporters of the homeless shelter towards the lady
who complained about fears of being bothered by the homeless people and he was
concerned about that attitude and how they would respond if a problem does
appear. If the PATH organization
was concerned about the retail businesses why wasn’t he, as a retail business
contacted about their concerns before the first show was put on over at the
church. No one contacted him and he
produces sales tax for the City of Red Bluff. If patrons to his business are hit up by
panhandlers, it will hurt his return business. A lot of this could have been taken care
of earlier if the people in the area would have been contacted and talked
with. Even though it will be
remodeled, if they are putting people with dogs and tents out in the front yard
and all of the little kids in the trailer park have to walk by that every
morning on the way to school it’s not good for them. There should have been a lot more
communication done and a lot more openness about it.
Comment #37
Bobbie Cook, widow and grandmother in Red Bluff, has
volunteered with schools and wants to start helping the homeless and is not
afraid of them.
Comment #38
Frank Dering, concerned citizen, lives in that area
and explained that the kids don’t go that direction to go to school and won’t
pass by the shelter. They have the
Greenville Rancheria in that area now and it’s efficient for them and there will
be a bus turn around eventually and they won’t have to go by the schools at some
point.
Comment #39
Miley Nail, operates a private shelter, and they
have the same issues. The residents
that they have housed have offered to go to work in the local store as
maintenance to help clean up and avoids panhandling as they can do for
themselves.
Comment #40
Loree Spurgeon, concerned citizen, supports the
shelter and volunteered a couple of nights this winter and was pleased to see
the little children having a place to sleep, a good breakfast, and very cheerily
going off to school.
Comment #41
Alexander Peterson, volunteer, has found the people
at the shelter just like you and me.
He is a retired teamster and a truck driver and met a lot of people and
the homeless people are just like them.
He felt that everyone deserves a hot meal and a safe place to stay.
Comment #42
Mary Gibbs, Secretary for PATH, said that this is
her fourth year working with PATH and they have diligently been working on
grants and they have a renovation project grant in process now. They will do
what ever it takes to make this project happen. She does understand the
neighbors concerns and they will work with everyone to do what they can and
comply with all of the permit requirements and that an environmental impact
study is under way.
Comment #43
Jeannie Ruiz, supporter for shelter, was homeless
once and it gave her hope and allowed her to want to give back. They had support programs and financial
management and showed how to get a job.
The people are willing to give a helping hand and everyone deserves a
second chance. Every person is willing to help and some have even cleaned up
cigarette butts that they didn’t even leave. The homeless people asked what they
could do and helped her to reorganize her community closet and she asked that
they be given a chance.
Comment #44
Tony King, Deacon of Public Ministries, and receives
emergency referrals and housing requests.
They try to coordinate and work as a team and supported the shelter in
this location.
Mayor Cherveny closed the Public Hearing at 9:21
p.m. and thanked everyone for every comment.
Councilmember Stevens brought up the comment that
was made about if someone was panhandling and whether someone would come back to
a business. He explained that it
was unfortunate but that was sometimes the way some people are going to get some
money and that he has been asked for money around various businesses and still
goes back to those businesses. He also mentioned his concerns about the age of
the building, but felt that rehabilitation was a possibility. He thanked everyone and commended
everyone for having some fine things to say and expressed his strong support of
the homeless shelter on Montgomery Road.
Councilmember Avilla inquired about the term
conditional Use Permit. Charles
Hayden, Planning Director explained that it meant that they would make sure that
they would comply with all of the Regulations and they would verify that they
complied with the approved plans and will continue to operate within the
limitations of that Use Permit.
Councilmember Avilla also asked if it was better for
a community in terms of law enforcement to have a shelter like this to help with
enforcement issues. Chief Shamblin
said that the Police will respond to any issues that might
develop.
Councilmember Houghton, mentioned lack of
notification about the project, the contamination of the garage, and the issue
of tents. Charles Hayden, Planning Director, sent out required notices within
300 ft prior to the Planning Commission hearing and published an ad in the
newspaper. PATH conducted informal hearings as well. They will have to have approval from
State agencies if contaminated soils are found. There is an area designated for tents
and a fence will be installed.
Charles Hayden, Planning Director explained that
amendments can be made but requested that they comply with CEQA and that the
mitigation measures are equivalent or better than existing measures and that
those modifications don’t have unmitigated impacts.
Councilmember Flynn questioned the reason for the change from 25 beds to 40 beds and it was the suggestion in order for the facility to be big enough for future growth.
Richard Crabtree, City Attorney, added that a Conditional Use Permit is probably the best enforcement vehicle in terms of regulating the use. By definition the use is permitted only if they are meeting the conditions and that during the length of that use the City can enforce those conditions up to and including polling the Conditional Use Permit. The City is free to make changes toward what the Planning Commission did as long as they don’t make changes that increase the environmental impact.
Councilmember Stevens explained that some of the clients have pets and that is the purpose of the tents and they are not in a visible area to the street.
Charles Hayden, Planning Director explained that some of the clients do not want to stay inside of a building for their own particular reason and tents are made available to them and that is the purpose of the fence.
Mayor Cherveny had looked at the area and felt a shelter would enhance the area providing that the standards are adhered to and there is a need in our community for this service. The Planning Commissioners put a lot of effort and time into this and are to be commended for their work.
Councilmember Flynn questioned whether the 40 beds were needed and it was determined that if people were turned away it might create problems. It was also noted that the more occupants that occupy the facility the greater the fire protection conditions and regulations that are required by the Fire Department such as additional sprinkler systems for the facility.
M/S/C Stevens, Avilla to Uphold the Planning Commission’s decisions to approve the Homeless Shelter with the findings and conditions approved by the Planning Commission.
AYES:
Councilmembers:
Avilla, Cherveny, Flynn, Houghton, Stevens
NOES:
None
ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: None
M/S/C Stevens, Avilla to withdraw the first motion and move to accept item two, to uphold the decisions of the Planning Commission, and modify the conditions of approval with findings supporting modifications of conditions, to limit to two tents with the amended motion equivalent to or better than the existing conditions and that it does not cause adverse impact to mitigated circumstances.
AYES:
Councilmembers:
Avilla, Cherveny, Flynn, Houghton, Stevens
NOES:
None
ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: None
MEADOW VISTA APARTMENTS
WATER BOOSTER STATION
Gary Antone, Director of Public Works, reviewed the staff report and gave staff’s recommendation to void the original agreement (Exhibit A) and accept the revised agreement (Exhibit B) with Red Bluff Meadow Vista Associates for the installation of the water booster station at Meadow Vista Apartments and direct staff to proceed with the work.
Susan Price, City Manager,
mentioned that this was a project done with a HOME grant and that it is
affordable family housing.
Councilmember Houghton
confirmed that the $7,900 included labor.
M/S/C Stevens, Avilla to void the original agreement (Exhibit A) and accept the revised agreement (Exhibit B) with Red Bluff Meadow Vista Associates for the installation of the water booster station at Meadow Vista Apartments and direct staff to proceed with the work.
AYES:
Councilmembers:
Avilla, Flynn, Houghton, Stevens, Cherveny
NOES:
None
ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: None
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
REVIEW/UPDATE
Gary Antone, Director of Public Works, reviewed the staff report and gave staff’s recommendation that City Council discuss and provide input regarding the Development Impact Fee Study and direct staff accordingly.
Susan Price, City Manager, mentioned that these are development impact fees, which are different than the User Fee Study.
The cost to prepare the Development Impact Fee Study will be spread across different impact fees so that it will not be paid from the general fund.
Councilmember Houghton mentioned that people complained that fees are too high. In general the fee structure is consistent with other communities and in most cases less. The purpose of the Development Impact Fees is to mitigate the impacts that come from development.
Richard Crabtree, City Attorney, explained that what a good study does is it quantifies the impacts of new development and says on a per unit basis this is your impact. If those fees are challenged they are required to show a reasonable relationship to the fees and the impacts. The Council is always free to charge a lower fee than the study says is justified and not free to charge a higher fee than is justified.
M/S/C Avilla, Flynn to proceed with the Development Impact Fee Study and direct staff accordingly.
AYES:
Councilmembers:
Avilla, Flynn, Houghton, Stevens, Cherveny
NOES:
None
ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: None
BRICKYARD APARTMENTS FLOOD
CONTROL PROJECT AWARD
Gary Antone, Director of Public Works, reviewed the staff report and gave staff’s recommendation to award the Brickyard Apartments Flood Control Project to Valley Paving of Redding, California for the amount: $323,638.83, which includes the base bid work and alternatives.
M/S/C Flynn, Houghton to award the Brickyard Apartments Flood Control Project to Valley Paving of Redding, California for the amount: $323,638.83, which includes the base bid work and alternatives.
AYES:
Councilmembers:
Avilla, Flynn, Houghton, Stevens, Cherveny
NOES:
None
ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: None
PURCHASE OF WASTEWATER
COLLECTION DIVISION MINI SEWER CAMERA AND LOCATOR UNIT
Gary Antone, Director of Public Works, reviewed the staff report and gave staff’s recommendation to authorize the sole source purchase of the used sewer mini camera and locator unit in the amount of $5,600 with existing wastewater funds.
M/S/C Stevens, Houghton to authorize the sole source purchase of the used sewer mini camera and locator unit in the amount of $5,600 with existing wastewater funds.
AYES:
Councilmembers:
Avilla, Flynn, Houghton, Stevens, Cherveny
NOES:
None
ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: None
WWTP DRYING BED SLUDGE
DISCHARD
Informational
WELL NO. 10 PUMP AND
FACILITY REPLACEMENT PROJECT
Gary Antone, Director of Public Works, reviewed the staff report and gave staff’s recommendation to:
1.
Authorize a supplemental
budget appropriation of $88, 100 for account number 50-50-540-100,
and
2.
Award
the Well No. 10 pump and facility replacement project to Wright Bros., Inc. of
Red Bluff, California in the amount of $171,000.
M/S/C Stevens, Avilla to
authorize a
supplemental budget appropriation of $88, 100 for account number 50-50-540-100,
and award the Well No. 10 pump and facility replacement project to Wright Bros.,
Inc. of Red Bluff, California in the amount of $171,000.
AYES:
Councilmembers:
Avilla, Flynn, Houghton, Stevens, Cherveny
NOES:
None
ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: None
CITY HALL HVAC DUCT
CLEANING
Gary Antone, Director of Public Works, reviewed the staff report and gave staff’s recommendation to:
1.
Authorize a supplemental
budget appropriation of $4,700 for account number 10-57-340-100, and
2.
Award
the City Hall duct inspection/cleaning project to American Duct Cleaning or
Redding, CA in the amount of $4,700.
M/S/C Cherveny, Flynn to authorize
a supplemental budget appropriation of $4,700 for account number 10-57-340-100,
and award the City Hall duct inspection/cleaning project to American Duct
Cleaning or Redding, CA in the amount of $4,700.
AYES:
Councilmembers:
Avilla, Flynn, Houghton, Stevens, Cherveny
NOES:
None
ABSENT OR NOT VOTING: None
COMMITTEE REPORTS/COUNCIL
COMMENTS
Councilmember Stevens reminded everyone that there are issues before the Transportation Commission tomorrow as well as a JPA Meeting.
Councilmember Houghton mentioned that he saw that new boat dock and it looks very nice.
ADJOURNMENT
At 10:37 P.M. Mayor Cherveny
adjourned the meeting to June 3, 2003 at 7:00 P.M., in the Red Bluff City
Council Chambers.
Mayor
ATTEST: